<th id="hfnb9"></th>
<span id="hfnb9"></span><span id="hfnb9"></span><strike id="hfnb9"></strike>
<span id="hfnb9"><dl id="hfnb9"></dl></span><strike id="hfnb9"></strike>
<strike id="hfnb9"><i id="hfnb9"><del id="hfnb9"></del></i></strike>
<strike id="hfnb9"></strike>
<strike id="hfnb9"></strike><ruby id="hfnb9"><i id="hfnb9"></i></ruby>
<span id="hfnb9"></span>
<strike id="hfnb9"></strike>
<strike id="hfnb9"><i id="hfnb9"><cite id="hfnb9"></cite></i></strike><strike id="hfnb9"></strike>
<span id="hfnb9"></span>
<ruby id="hfnb9"><i id="hfnb9"></i></ruby>
精選學問分享網

巴菲特持有富國銀行多少股份

Mork:1990年巴菲特致股東的信:為什么買入富國銀行

"With Wells Fargo, we think we have obtained the best managers in the business, Carl Reichardt and Paul Hazen. In many ways the combination of Carl and Paul reminds me of another - Tom Murphy and Dan Burke at Capital Cities/ABC. First, each pair is stronger than the sum of its parts because each partner understands, trusts and admires the other. Second, both managerial teams pay able people well, but abhor having a bigger head count than is needed. Third, both attack costs as vigorously when profits are at record levels as when they are under pressure. Finally, both stick with what they understand and let their abilities, not their egos, determine what they attempt. (Thomas J. Watson Sr. of IBM followed the same rule: "I'm no genius," he said. "I'm smart in spots - but I stay around those spots.")
Our purchases of Wells Fargo in 1990 were helped by a chaotic market in bank stocks. The disarray was appropriate: Month by month the foolish loan decisions of once well-regarded banks were put on public display. As one huge loss after another was unveiled - often on the heels of managerial assurances that all was well - investors understandably concluded that no bank's numbers were to be trusted. Aided by their flight from bank stocks, we purchased our 10% interest in Wells Fargo for $290 million, less than five times after-tax earnings, and less than three times pre-tax earnings.
Wells Fargo is big - it has $56 billion in assets - and has been earning more than 20% on equity and 1.25% on assets. Our purchase of one-tenth of the bank may be thought of as roughly equivalent to our buying 100% of a $5 billion bank with identical financial characteristics. But were we to make such a purchase, we would have to pay about twice the $290 million we paid for Wells Fargo. Moreover, that $5 billion bank, commanding a premium price, would present us with another problem: We would not be able to find a Carl Reichardt to run it. In recent years, Wells Fargo executives have been more avidly recruited than any others in the banking business; no one, however, has been able to hire the dean.
Of course, ownership of a bank - or about any other business - is far from riskless. California banks face the specific risk of a major earthquake, which might wreak enough havoc on borrowers to in turn destroy the banks lending to them. A second risk is systemic - the possibility of a business contraction or financial panic so severe that it would endanger almost every highly-leveraged institution, no matter how intelligently run. Finally, the market's major fear of the moment is that West Coast real estate values will tumble because of overbuilding and deliver huge losses to banks that have financed the expansion. Because it is a leading real estate lender, Wells Fargo is thought to be particularly vulnerable."
-------BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. Chairman(Warren Buffet)'s Letter

巴菲特為何減持富國銀行?

2018年8月14日,巴菲特旗下公司伯克希爾·哈撒韋向美國證券交易委員會提交的報告顯示,2018年第二季度,該公司增持了1240萬股蘋果公司股票,增幅5.2%,共持約2.52億股,季末市值約466億美元。

截至8月14日收盤,蘋果公司股價報收于209.75美元,較上一交易日上漲了0.42%,按照這一收盤價,伯克希爾·哈撒韋持有的蘋果股票價值達528.57億美元。

這已是伯克希爾連續第二個季度增持蘋果公司股票,一季度伯克希爾增持蘋果7420萬股,使蘋果取代富國銀行,成為伯克希爾持倉最大的股票。截至一季度末,伯克希爾累計持有約2.396億股蘋果股票,持股比例約為4.8%,已成為蘋果公司的第二大股東。

在5月舉行的伯克希爾2018年股東大會上,巴菲特曾表示,蘋果公司有一些非常好的消費類產品,不管要不要買,蘋果股票都物有所值。對于蘋果今年4月宣布包括回購股票在內的1000億美元規模資本返還計劃,他感到很高興。當時巴菲特說,伯克希爾持有5%的蘋果股票,也許以后持股比例會增加到6%、7%。

“如果你看看蘋果,我認為它的收入幾乎是美國第二大盈利公司的兩倍?!卑头铺卦f。

銀行股方面,伯克希爾·哈撒韋選擇了增持高盛、減持富國銀行。

在2008年金融危機期間,伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司首次購買高盛的優先股。在2018年第二季度,它的持股數量增加了21%,增加到了約1325萬股。截至今年6月底,這些股票價值約29.2億美元。值得一提的是,2018年以來,高盛的跌幅已接近10%。

與此同時,伯克希爾·哈撒韋對富國銀行的持股仍在繼續減少。

二季度伯克希爾減持富國銀行450萬股,減持股份數量為一季度減持規模172萬股的2.6倍,持倉降至約4.52億股,季末市值約251億美元。使得富國銀行成為該公司二季度末的第二大持倉。8月14日,富國銀行股價收漲0.8%,報58.07美元,較二季度末漲近4%。

不過,這一減持未必代表伯克希爾對富國銀行的不看好。

8月13日,伯克希爾·哈撒韋在官網上發布的一份聲明中稱:“這些買賣決策并未反映我們的投資管理層對相關股票吸引力的看法,而是遵守持股不超過10%的原則”。

伯克希爾公司在這份聲明中稱,除了少數例外,該公司希望避免持有10%或更多的被投資股票。

“由于許多投資者正在回購這些股票,伯克希爾有時需要進行少量出售,以避免達到10%的門檻。在第二季度,這種自我設定的限制導致伯克希爾出售了銀行和航空業的少量股權,同時伯克希爾還購買了同行業其他公司的股票?!甭暶髦羞@樣寫道?!?/p>

巴菲特持有富國銀行股票賺了多少倍

你所說的這種承包是《中華人民共和國農村土地承包法》中家庭承包方式以外的其他承包方式。其中第三條規定“ 國家實行農村土地承包經營制度。農村土地承包采取農村集體經濟組織內部的家庭承包方式,不宜采取家庭承包方式的荒山、荒溝、荒丘、荒灘等農村土地,可以采取招標、拍賣、公開協商等方式承包。 ”
這就是說要采取招標、拍賣、公開協商的方式進行承包。
但首要的是那個地方必須有荒山,如果有才能進行承包。如果已經承包給了別人,還得等別人的承包期滿了以后現進行競爭。
當然村里的主要領導那是不能馬虎的,主要是要做一做村書記、村長的工作。
其他部門并不是很重要。

巴菲特現在重倉長期持有的股票都有什么?

你知道有啥用???股票永遠做的是未來 巴菲特持有的短期消費品比較多 現金流充裕的企業比較多

Mork:1990年巴菲特致股東的信:為什么買入富國銀行

"With Wells Fargo, we think we have obtained the best managers in the business, Carl Reichardt and Paul Hazen. In many ways the combination of Carl and Paul reminds me of another - Tom Murphy and Dan Burke at Capital Cities/ABC. First, each pair is stronger than the sum of its parts because each partner understands, trusts and admires the other. Second, both managerial teams pay able people well, but abhor having a bigger head count than is needed. Third, both attack costs as vigorously when profits are at record levels as when they are under pressure. Finally, both stick with what they understand and let their abilities, not their egos, determine what they attempt. (Thomas J. Watson Sr. of IBM followed the same rule: "I'm no genius," he said. "I'm smart in spots - but I stay around those spots.")
Our purchases of Wells Fargo in 1990 were helped by a chaotic market in bank stocks. The disarray was appropriate: Month by month the foolish loan decisions of once well-regarded banks were put on public display. As one huge loss after another was unveiled - often on the heels of managerial assurances that all was well - investors understandably concluded that no bank's numbers were to be trusted. Aided by their flight from bank stocks, we purchased our 10% interest in Wells Fargo for $290 million, less than five times after-tax earnings, and less than three times pre-tax earnings.
Wells Fargo is big - it has $56 billion in assets - and has been earning more than 20% on equity and 1.25% on assets. Our purchase of one-tenth of the bank may be thought of as roughly equivalent to our buying 100% of a $5 billion bank with identical financial characteristics. But were we to make such a purchase, we would have to pay about twice the $290 million we paid for Wells Fargo. Moreover, that $5 billion bank, commanding a premium price, would present us with another problem: We would not be able to find a Carl Reichardt to run it. In recent years, Wells Fargo executives have been more avidly recruited than any others in the banking business; no one, however, has been able to hire the dean.
Of course, ownership of a bank - or about any other business - is far from riskless. California banks face the specific risk of a major earthquake, which might wreak enough havoc on borrowers to in turn destroy the banks lending to them. A second risk is systemic - the possibility of a business contraction or financial panic so severe that it would endanger almost every highly-leveraged institution, no matter how intelligently run. Finally, the market's major fear of the moment is that West Coast real estate values will tumble because of overbuilding and deliver huge losses to banks that have financed the expansion. Because it is a leading real estate lender, Wells Fargo is thought to be particularly vulnerable."
-------BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. Chairman(Warren Buffet)'s Letter

2008金融危機為何巴菲特投資荷蘭銀行股

巴菲特一直被投資者頂禮膜拜奉為“股神”,全球金融危機大爆發的背景下,美國及歐洲的大銀行出現了嚴重的危機,這讓許多投資者無所適從,憂心忡忡,對市場毫無信心。但是巴菲特在逆市中尋得機會,最近四年他增持國富銀行24億美元、買入美國銀行50億美元優先股。正是他這種別人恐懼時貪婪、才得以在低價位時買入最好的銀行??v觀股神巴菲特過去二十多年的投資經理,可以歸結為以下幾點:
工具/原料
第一,巴菲特選擇銀行股的標準非常高。
1、業績一流:巴菲特1991年大量買入富國銀行時用兩個業績指標來評價,“過去的凈資產收益率(ROE)和總資產收益率(ROA)都要優秀?!?008年金融危機之后,巴菲特第一大銀行重倉股富國銀行過去三年ROE為11.6%、10.4%、11.9%,ROA為1%、1%、1.2%,逐年增長;運通銀行過去三年ROE則為16%、26%、28%,ROA為1.7%、3%、3.3%,同樣逐年增長。
2、管理一流:巴菲特強調管理對銀行業績影響很大,“銀行業并非我們偏愛的行業。如果資產是股東權益的20倍,那么一個只是涉及一小部分資產的錯誤就能夠毀滅掉很大部分的股東權益?!边@也是目前國內投資者對于銀行股的詬病所在。財務杠桿同時放大了管理上的優勢和劣勢,所以巴菲特對以“便宜的”的價格買進一家管理糟糕的銀行毫無興趣,他唯一的興趣是以合理的價格買進管理良好的銀行。
3、規模一流:2011年巴菲特投資組合中6大銀行資產規模在美國排名分別是,美國銀行排第1,富國銀行第4,合眾銀行第10,紐約梅隆銀行第11,美國運通第19,M&T銀行第29,都是規模很大的銀行。巴菲特之所以只投資大銀行,是因為銀行業規模優勢非常重要,而且規模越大銀行越難被收購,股價往往更加便宜。
方法/步驟
1
第二,巴菲特長期重倉持有銀行股。
2007年巴菲特投資組合為總市值688億美元,其中5只銀行股市值197億美元;2011年投資組合總市值662億美元,其中5只銀行股市值198億美元,以富國銀行和美國運通持倉最重。不僅如此,巴菲特持有銀行股的時間周期也非常長。富國銀行持有至今已23年,美國運通銀行、M&T銀行持有至今也已經21年。
END
注意事項
第三,巴菲特都是在銀行股價大跌之后趁機大量買入。
巴菲特1990年買入富國銀行時市盈率不到5倍:“1990年我們能夠大規模買入富國銀行,得益于當時一片混亂的銀行股市場行情……在投資者紛紛拋售逃離銀行股的風潮中,我們才得以投資2.9億美元買入富國銀行10%的股份,我們買入的股價低于稅后利潤的5倍,低于稅前利潤的3倍?!?br/>投資是有風險的,如何在風險中獲得收益是每個投資者都關心的問題,我們不讓學習一下巴菲特在逆市爆發的發展法則,或許有助你在投資的道路上越走越遠。